Home ... The Council ... CCC ... Councillors ... Empty promises: just rinse and recycle
Kitewood, the creators of Altira Tumbleweed Park, want to recycle their unused "Blacksole Bridge commitment" as a lever for winning another planning consent, thus reducing their average costs to half-an-imaginary-bridge per consent. The photo accompanying the Gazette article shows the outline of the area covered by the planning consent Kitewood want. It's huge.

Empty promises: just rinse and recycle

Kitewood, the creators of Altira Tumbleweed Park, want to recycle their unused “Blacksole Bridge commitment” as a lever for winning another planning consent, thus reducing their average costs to half-an-imaginary-bridge per consent.

The photo accompanying the Gazette article shows the outline of the area covered by the planning consent Kitewood want. It’s huge.

The tilted angle gives a foreshortened view, which doesn’t really do credit to Kitewood’s territorial ambitions.

click it to big it

In refusing to build the new bridge at Blacksole, Kitewood are entirely and exactly within the letter of their contract with CCC. The bridge-building is triggered by  a certain level of occupancy, and to my mind CCC were completely daft to allow this clause anywhere near the contract. (Apart from anything else, it’s open to abuse. In some Mediterranean countries, construction tax is levied only when the building is complete: result – a lot of 98% complete, but fully functional, buildings.) The new bridge was (rightly) viewed as a necessity to ensure our safety in the face of increased traffic. The level of traffic started increasing from Day One of Altira’s development, so it would have made sense to build the new bridge right at the beginning.

What boggles me (and I only learned it from this Gazette article) is that Kitewood have already trousered a £1.3m up-front subsidy! Despite their best efforts, they’ve not met their occupancy targets, and that presumably hurts them in the wallet. But they’re under no contractual obligation whatsoever to build the bridge. Yet. They’ve got their (our?) £1.3m, and nobody has mentioned giving it back. They’re laughing! They must have thought our negotiators were idiots. I do.

And now Kitewood are offering to enter into a legally binding agreement (just as they already have for the Altira development) committing them to building a new bridge IF (and only if) they are given planning consent for a very large development. In Kitewood’s shoes, I would be falling over myself to strike deals with Canterbury – win a million quid and do sweet F.A. is a great start! It’s very easy to paint Kitewood as being the bad guys in this long and sorry tale, but they are actually just playing by the rules that CCC set and signed up to.

I’m afraid the villains of the piece appear to be those officers/members in CCC who drew up, and signed off, the dismally flawed S106 agreement. They really screwed up.

Safety fears over delay for planned pedestrian bridge

Developers have been accused of “holding a gun” to the heads of city councillors in a row about a pedestrian footbridge in Broomfield. At a special meeting on 7th July, Kitewood – which owns the Altira Business Park in Margate Road – said it would build a new bridge over the nearby railway crossing within a year, but only if it was given consent for a 700-home development in Hillborough. Kitewood director Michael Dolan called for councillors and planning officers to support the proposal, describing it as a “trade-off”.

The unofficial meeting, which dismissed the idea of traffic lights on the current Blacksole Bridge, was called by Bay councillor Peter Vickery-Jones following years of concerns over safety. Due to a condition agreed by the city council, Kitewood – which negotiated £l.3 million off the purchase of the land to pay for the bridge – is not obliged to build it until 17,000 square metres of the site is occupied. Mr Dolan told the meeting this could take as long as four or five years. He said:

“There is not the money in the pot to build the bridge now but it’s not for want of trying. There has to be the generation of wealth first. And for that there will need to be planning consent for further developments. I can promise we will enter into a legally bound commitment to press forward with this bridge if we receive support for the housing scheme at Hillborough. The uplift in the value of the land will provide funds to build a new bridge within a year. And you can have any lawyers you want draft that commitment up and we will sign it.”

Bay MP Roger Gale slammed the situation, saying:

“A harsh man would say Altira have already had their money as £1.3 million was knocked off the asking price for the land. The reality is someone at the city council put this ludicrous condition into the plans which says you will have your bridge when 17,000 square metres is occupied. But that could be in four to five years, in which time one or two people could be killed. And if that happens the county council, city council and, most importantly the developers should be held accountable. You could say it looks like they’re holding a gun to our heads. They are saying ‘we will give you our undertaking to build the bridge if we get consent’ – and there’s the gun.”

Kitewood confirmed it is committed to building the bridge when the 17,000 square metre limit is passed. City councillor Peter Vickery-Jones said he was disappointed with the Kitewood proposal, but understood the reasons for it:

“There has to be an opportunity for the developers, and I’m all for getting the situation resolved as early as possible. I would hate to think something would happen on that bridge and I hadn’t done my utmost to address the problems. But this proposal is undeliverable. Every planning application has to be judged on its own merit. It’s a shame we’ve found ourselves in somewhat of a hostage situation.”

HB Gazette 8th July 2010

Visit www.SaveHillborough.info for more

Check Also

Solar farm at Owl’s Hatch Road near Herne given go-ahead

One of Britain’s biggest solar farms – capable of powering the whole of Herne Bay …

No comments

  1. heres a response from kitewood from the hillboroughextension discussion forum:Hillborough says:September 4, 2011 at 7:36 pmEditors Note: The true proposition is actually the reverse of what is being said. This is something that CCC should have dealt with many years before Altira Business Park was approved, they played catch up when Altira came on their radar having missed the opportunity of making the developers of the houses that have actually caused the congestion responsible for the bridge in the first place. There is nothing to stop KCC carrying out the works right now and it is abdication of political responsibility to try and posit the blame for any future accident, should one occur, at Kitewoods doorstep. This is a political issue that should have been resolved by the politicians long ago and whilst we do not recognise the comment you attribute to Roger Gale MP and therefore do not address the following comment to him, taking cheap shots at Kitewood would scarcely behove any responsible politician.then in response that they had excluded it from their last development plan because of the occupancy limit:Hillborough says:September 4, 2011 at 7:27 pmEditors Note: Kitewood wishes it to be known that they did not excluded anything. CCC recognised that if Kitewood were to pay for the bridge works they needed to be able to develop a certain part of Altira Business Park to generate the necessary funds. Because of the recession, not enough development has taken place at Altira and the necessary funds have not been generated. This is not a question of Kitewood avoiding any obligation it has. Kitewood fully intends to honour its obligation.